Free resource
Human-made music: what to keep
Free to use and share. No email asked. Not legal advice.
A checklist and per-track log for composers, songwriters and producers who want to show how their music was made, and answer "is any of this AI?" with confidence.
From DADAAUDIO · www.dadaaudio.com. This is a practical guide, not legal advice.
How to use it
- Go through the checklist once and set up your habits (folders, naming, backups).
- For every track you release, pitch or deliver, fill in one row of the track log.
- Keep the log and the files together, and back them up somewhere other than your working drive.
1. While you write and produce
- Save the project/session under a new name at each meaningful stage (sketch, demo, after notes, final) instead of overwriting it
- Keep MIDI files, especially parts you played in
- Keep early sketches: voice memos, phone recordings, piano ideas
- Keep scores, lead sheets, chord charts and notebook pages (scan or photograph paper)
- Bounce a dated version whenever the track changes direction
- Write a few lines of notes as you go: what the track is for, what's live, what's virtual, which tools you used
- If any AI tool touches the track, write down which tool, when, and exactly what it did
2. Recording sessions
- Date and place of each session
- Names of players and singers, with what they played
- Raw takes (not just the comped result)
- Session musician agreements or invoices
- Engineer and studio credits
3. Delivery and versions
- Final main mix, dated
- Alt mixes, instrumental, cutdowns (e.g. 30 s, 60 s), each named clearly
- Stems for every delivered version
- Earlier versions kept, not deleted, after a new mix replaces them
4. Paperwork
- Split sheet signed (or agreed in writing) by every writer and producer
- Credits with roles, IPI numbers and societies
- Sample and loop licences: pack or source, licence terms, which tracks use them
- The brief and client notes for commissioned work, plus your replies
- Any warranty you gave about AI use in a licence, with the exact wording
5. Stating AI use
Pick the line that is true for each track and use it consistently in metadata, notes, pitches and licences.
| Case | What it means | Example wording |
|---|---|---|
| No generative AI | A person wrote, performed and produced everything; ordinary production tools only | "Written, performed and produced by [name]. No generative AI was used." |
| AI-assisted | A person made the music; an AI tool did a defined job | "Composed and produced by [name]. [Tool] was used for [job]; no part of the final audio was generated." |
| AI-generated elements | Part of the audio or composition came from a generative tool | "Contains AI-generated [element], created with [tool]. Composition/production of the rest by [name]." |
- AI statement written in the track's notes or metadata
- Same statement used in pitches and library submissions
- Society registration checked against your society's current AI policy (e.g. ASCAP, BMI, SOCAN, PRS, SIAE, GEMA, SACEM)
6. Storage
- Working files and the log kept together per track
- Original file dates preserved (copy, don't re-export, when archiving)
- At least one backup off your working drive
- Nothing deleted just because a newer version exists
7. Answering a supervisor
Template:
No generative AI was used on this track. I wrote and produced it in [month, year]; [live parts] were recorded on [date] at [place], the rest is played in on virtual instruments. I can share stems or an early bounce if useful.
Track log
Fill in one row per track. In the spreadsheet version each column is a field.
| Track title | Started (date) | Finished (date) | Writers and splits | Players / recording dates | Session file(s) kept | MIDI kept | Early versions kept (dates) | Stems kept | Samples / loops used (licence) | AI tools used (tool, what it did) | AI statement | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes / No | Yes / No | Yes / No | None / … | |||||||||
| Yes / No | Yes / No | Yes / No | None / … | |||||||||
| Yes / No | Yes / No | Yes / No | None / … | |||||||||
| Yes / No | Yes / No | Yes / No | None / … | |||||||||
| Yes / No | Yes / No | Yes / No | None / … |
Good to know
- The EU AI Act's transparency rules (Article 50, from 2 August 2026) apply to providers and professional deployers of AI systems. They don't require a composer who doesn't use AI to label anything.
- The US Copyright Office protects only human-authored expression; prompts alone aren't enough, and AI-generated material that is more than de minimis should be excluded when registering.
- ASCAP, BMI and SOCAN accept partially AI-generated works (since October 2025) but not works made entirely with AI. Other societies have their own rules.
From the DADAAUDIO blog · www.dadaaudio.com/blog